Skip to content
avenset
Evening light moving across a curved glass facade
For family offices

Investment
screening.

Assess new opportunities against the family’s mandate. Bring revenue quality, portfolio exposure and prior decisions into a sourced screening memo.

The screening experience

From opportunity
to screening memo.

A two-minute walkthrough of the initial screen, relevant precedent and analyst approval. Inspect the supporting evidence at each stage.

Choose a chapter to explore
avensetOak family officeProduct demo

Start with the introduction and investment deck. Review the reported financials and proposed cheque against the family’s screening requirements.

Opportunities
Your opportunity pipeline

The next investment.

Review the incoming opportunity and its source materials.

OOrenda IdentitySoftware / United KingdomNew opportunity
MMorrow DiagnosticsHealthcare / EuropeIn pipeline
VVolta MobilityEnergy / North AmericaIn pipeline
Introduction: Orenda IdentityAmelia Shaw, Northbank Partners
Opportunity and source identified.
01 / 05

Bring precedent
into the decision.

Retrieve the original investment case.
Compare it with what happened next.

Explore the investment record
Integration routes to scope with your office.
Microsoft 365AddeparDealCloudSalesforceXplanExcelPower BIPitchBookSharePointOneDriveCompanies HouseSource documents

The investment case, in one place.

Assess the opportunity against the family’s mandate, existing holdings and prior decisions.

Investment memory

Retrieve the rationale behind earlier decisions.

Search the investment record
Does Orenda fit our mandate and existing portfolio?

The supporting record

Documents, mandate and prior decisions.

Orenda Identity

Review the source documents, mandate and prior decisions associated with this investment.

Investment matrix

Compare financial inputs, mandate fit and outstanding questions.

Investment matrixOak Family OfficeInvestment research
Open a source document, financial snapshot or company brief. Monetary values in GBP millions.
CompanySource documentsSectorFinancials & growthInvestment snapshotMandate contextRevenue profileBalance sheetCapital
SoftwareReview for diligence

34.4% sector exposure after cheque · 35% mandate cap

HealthcareOutside mandate

35.8% sector exposure after cheque · 35% mandate cap

EnergyOutside mandate

40.1% sector exposure after cheque · 35% mandate cap

SoftwarePortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

HealthcarePortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

EnergyPortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

IndustrialsPortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

SoftwarePortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

HealthcarePortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

IndustrialsPortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

EnergyPortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

HealthcarePortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

IndustrialsPortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

SoftwarePortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

HealthcarePortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

IndustrialsPortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

EnergyPortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

SoftwarePortfolio review

Operating performance against the retained investment thesis.

18 recordsGBP millions · Open a cell to inspect its source

Three workflows.
One investment record.

£4.0mProposed cheque · Orenda Identity

Review the proposed cheque, revenue profile and geography against the mandate. Identify relevant prior decisions and the questions for diligence.

    Follow the workflow

    Your mandate.
    Your memory.
    Your judgement.

    Mandate first

    Establish whether the proposed cheque, geography and revenue profile meet the family’s criteria. Carry exceptions into the review.

    Relevant precedent

    Recover earlier committee decisions, related holdings and unresolved concerns. Use that history to frame the next diligence questions.

    Clear accountability

    Retain the evidence, assumptions and decision rationale. Make the reviewer and next step explicit.

    Define the process.
    Assign the responsibility.

    Agree the required inputs, screening checks and review owners. Use the same process to assess new opportunities and retain the decision record.

    Investment process
    Orenda Identity · Direct investment

    Evidence you can inspect.
    Decisions you can trace.

    Inspect the source, date and review status of material figures. Keep reported information separate from the team’s assessment.

    Identify the reported figure.

    Orenda reports £7.2m of revenue in its management note. The source, date and page stay attached to the input.

    £7.2mManagement note · page 1

    Connect the records
    your office already uses.

    Scope the documents, holdings and relationship records needed for the first workflow. Agree access, mapping and review responsibilities before connecting systems.

    Your office, connected
    Documents & models

    Connect the documents used in the investment review.

    Selected Outlook correspondence, SharePoint documents, OneDrive files and Excel models.

    Vendor documentation
    Microsoft 365 logoMicrosoft 365Agreed source records
    Avenset mappingFamily · entity · investment
    Review boundaryVerify the source and approve the change
    Put the record to workAssessment · review · briefing
    Rehab Mohsin, founder of AvensetRehab MohsinFounder, Avenset

    Investment experience.
    Implementation discipline.

    Rehab Mohsin founded Avenset after working in investment management, research, data integration and PE-backed AI adoption. His experience spans wealth management, strategy consultancy and family-office workflows.

    Questions before an engagement.

    The scope, responsibilities and controls behind the offering.

    Read the guide
    What does Avenset do?

    Avenset supports investment screening, portfolio review and principal reporting from a shared investment record. The initial focus is a sourced screening memo that brings the family’s mandate, revenue quality and prior decisions into the analyst’s review.

    How are the records connected?

    Each investment is linked to its holding entity, introducer, supporting documents and decision history. An ontology defines these relationships consistently, allowing the team to follow the evidence across records rather than relying on separate folders or personal recollection.

    How is previous investment work retained?

    The record retains the original investment rationale, reviewed updates and subsequent outcomes. Analysts can retrieve relevant precedent and establish what has changed. Dates, source references and unresolved questions remain part of the history.

    Do we have to replace our existing systems?

    Avenset is designed around the office’s existing systems. Implementation starts by identifying the required records and agreeing access, mapping and review responsibilities. Live connectors depend on vendor access, licences and the agreed scope.

    Can I check where a number came from?

    Yes. Open the source beside an assessment, holding or incoming report. Proposed financial changes remain separate from approved figures until reviewed. Screening and model outputs retain the inputs and assumptions behind the calculation.

    Who reviews the investment assessment?

    The analyst reviews the proposed assessment before CIO review and the principal’s decision. The public experience uses explicit calculations and an authored guide. A live AI-assisted implementation requires agreed data access, evaluation and approval controls; it does not transfer investment authority to the software.

    What would a first engagement look like?

    Agree one workflow, its required records and the result the office needs. Establish the current baseline and acceptance criteria, then test the complete process with the team. Scope, timing, information controls and commercial terms are agreed before the pilot.

    Investment research papers and a linen folio in a shaft of afternoon light
    The next investmentAvenset

    Bring your next
    investment
    into focus.

    Review a new opportunity against your mandate. See the supporting evidence, material risks and questions for diligence.